<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="0.92"><channel><title>Exposing the conspiracy to turn men into pussies</title><link>http://antiwanksta.blog.co.uk/</link><description>Repowering men to continue holding their rightful place</description><language>en-UK</language><docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs><item><title>It's A Conspiracy, Men!</title><description>	&lt;p&gt;Ever since the 20th century checked in, men have slowly lost control of the wheels that make this world go round. Ever so meticulously, men have been brain washed to forget their rightful place in the scheme of things. Every major scientific breakthrough, every social development and economic advancment in human history has been made by men. It's not because women couldn't (or can't) do it, it's because men are called upon by destiny to control the world. This huge blue orb we call our planet...The environment we call our individual reality. The perspective doesn't really matter; fulfiling destiny does!&lt;br&gt;
Do not get me wrong, even in the slightest, I am for women's empowerment in its totality. I'm simply not for men's devolution of power. Empowering women does not meaning taking from men's powers, it simply means giving women equal opportunities, and a level playing ground, for them to fulfil their role in society. Whatever it (role) may be.&lt;br&gt;
That's where the 21st century society (at least in the western world) goes wrong. They do not understand that's it's not a case of taking from the empowered, but creating opportunities for the less empowered. For example, the law that gave divorcing wives half of their husband's property was based on the premise that a woman could not tend for herself after she left her husband. Has that rule been re-evaluated now that the modern woman has access to opportunities that give her equal empowerment (to men)? What of all the laws that gave women an 'advantage', have they been re-evaluated now that women are more or less, no longer disadvantaged? Please note I use the word 're-evaluate' because I still feel that there are areas in society where women are still disadvantaged. When you consider all the laws that were created to give women a 'level playing ground', you will realise that they have indeed worked, and work very effectively they have. In fact, so effective have these laws been, that if they are not re-evaluated within the next two decades, men will find themselves where women were in the 19th century!&lt;br&gt;
But am not a politician, and my motivation for writing this blog is not political. I just wanted to put you in the right frame of mind as you interact with this blog. This blog is about making love, not war. It's about empowering men to seduce the women of their dreams. It's about making men realise that their maleness is what attracts women. This blog will destroy all those mind sets that have been created over the last half century or so. Forget about women's empowerment, that's their boon. Don't confuse it with men having to change who they are because women are now empowered. That's total hogwash! A century of empowerment cannot change 40,000 years of evolution my comrades. Women are naturally attracted to men who control everything around them. Rembember that bit about being called by destiny to control your universe? Even women know it and expect if from you. So stop being misled by popular culture and realise that nice guys never get the girl. It's time you took your rightful place in the universe and became the master. You will be surprised at just how many women will find you attractive...
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://antiwanksta.blog.co.uk/2007/06/06/it_s_a_conspiracy_men~2404275/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://antiwanksta.blog.co.uk/2007/06/06/it_s_a_conspiracy_men~2404275/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 12:58:57 +0200</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
